Conflict Studies and Insights

Weekly Brief

13 July – 20 July 2026

BLUF — Bottom Line Up Front

Regional conflicts continue to escalate across key global flashpoints, marked by crippling drone strikes on Russian logistics, deadlocked IDF border negotiations and expanding operations, sharp spikes in oil prices ($90+/bbl) following US–Iran naval clashes, and heightened Southeast Asian border tensions over a Chinese arms delivery to Cambodia.

Conflict Status Chart

Theatre Phase Trend Progress to date
Russia–Ukraine Sustained War + Leadership Shakeup Escalating with Internal Strain Ukraine's Defence Minister Fedorov sacked 15 July after clash with top general over drone strategy, sparking street protests for several days; Ukraine's sea-drone campaign struck 159+ vessels over 12 days; Russia launched one of its largest ballistic missile attacks on Kyiv on 19 July.
Israel–Lebanon Active IDF Occupation Stalemate No pilot zone activated; no third-party monitor named; framework remains unimplemented three weeks after signing.
Israel–Gaza Phase 2 Talks Stalled Stalemate Momentum from the 8–9 July Cairo talks has not produced further public movement this week; NCAG has still not entered Gaza.
Israel–US–Iran / Hormuz Trust Breakdown Deteriorating Trust between US and Iran broke down again after the Islamabad talks; analysts say Pakistan has few remaining tools to bring both sides back.
Thailand–Cambodia Land Border Standoff Contained Dispute remains active because Thai barbed wire and other engineering works installed earlier in disputed areas at Mom Bei and Chob Ruan remain in place, Cambodia's protest notes still have no formal Thai reply, and neither side has shown signs of rolling back its position on the ground.

Key Developments

Theatre 01

Russia – Ukraine

Kerch Blockade & Kyiv Leadership Shakeup
Fires & Strikes
Maritime interdiction & Kerch logistics blockade

Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) and Security Service (SBU) reported knocking out 75% of the Kerch ferry crossing's capacity during the July "MoLoChKa" operation following targeted strikes on key supply vessels (including the Eysk and SKS One). Sustained Ukrainian naval drone strikes forced Russia to temporarily halt commercial and military logistics movement through the Don-Azov canal corridor, severely disrupting Russian maritime export and resupply networks supporting Russian forces in Southern Ukraine.intentguardian

C2Force Integration
Leadership reshuffle & political tension in Kyiv

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's sudden removal of Ukraine's Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov — a key figure in Ukraine's military digitisation and drone warfare push — triggered rare public protests with hundreds to thousands of people protesting in Kyiv and other cities from 18 to 20 July. The dismissal highlighted ongoing friction between tech-led modernisation initiatives and traditional military command structures under Commander-in-Chief Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi. Protesters' slogans and placards explicitly framed the dispute as a clash between modern, drone-heavy warfare and older command approaches, with messages like "Fight with drones, not people" and "Don't fix what isn't broken".kyivindependent

Implication [Fires & Strikes · C2 · Force Integration]
  • Naval drones knocked out 75% of Kerch ferry capacity in weeks. Any force that depends on a single chokepoint — a strait, a bridge, an island resupply route — should assume it will be attacked the same way. Harden the chokepoint or plan operations to survive without it.
  • Sea-drone strikes work when navy and army share sensors and can shoot fast. If a target only stays exposed for 20 minutes, the sensor-to-shooter chain has to be that fast. Rehearse joint navy–army handoffs before the crisis, not during it.
  • The Fedorov sacking shows what happens when new tech gets grafted onto old command structures without integration. The dispute is not about drones versus no drones — it is about who controls them and how they fit into existing units. Solve the integration question before the war, not during it. Do not set up a parallel drone command that clashes with the existing chain of command; put drones inside existing formations.
Theatre 02

Israel – Lebanon

Rome Talks Stall; Demolitions Continue
Diplomacy
Rome diplomatic track & "Pilot Zone" disagreements

High-level delegations from Israel and Lebanon convened in Rome under US auspices (with US CENTCOM coordination) to establish operational mechanisms for the 26 June Trilateral Framework Agreement. Talks stalled over the initial phase — a proposed IDF withdrawal from two designated "pilot zones" in Southern Lebanon. Lebanon demanded an immediate, unconditional IDF pullout from the pilot zones before discussing further security details. Israel conditioned withdrawal on strict verification that Hezbollah operatives are entirely absent and that the Lebanese Armed Forces can independently prevent re-entry. Disagreements also persisted over zone boundaries, including areas north of the Litani River.reuters

Civil-MilitaryInformation Ops
Frontier area hardening & systematic demolitions

The IDF expanded controlled demolitions of Hezbollah firing positions, supply caches, and fortified structures across border villages (e.g., Khiam). Lebanese officials reported significant infrastructure destruction in the border zone, including the destruction of three additional schools in southern Lebanon around 18 July.presstv

Implication [Civil-Military · Combat Engineering · Information Operations]
  • Israel is demolishing whole neighbourhoods to deny Hezbollah forward positions. It works tactically — no more ATGM launch points — but the cost is high: three more schools destroyed in the 18 July round, war-crimes allegations, and a hostile population for a generation.
  • A force that plans to hold ground through demolitions has to budget for the international response too: lawyers ready for war-crimes filings, public communications ready to explain each strike, and combat engineers who can build back some civilian infrastructure once the fighting slows. If any of those three is missing, tactical wins turn into political losses within months.
Theatre 03

Israel – Gaza

Rafah Strikes & Settler Border Breach
Fires & Strikes
Targeted air & engineering operations

IDF forces conducted targeted airstrikes and engineering clearing across Zeitoun (Gaza City), Khan Yunis, and Rafah, destroying weapons manufacturing sites, rocket positions, and subterranean shafts. Precision airstrikes targeted senior Hamas district commanders and security operatives in Rafah, aiming to disrupt local command-and-control networks.timesofisrael

Civil-Military
Gaza border breach attempt by right-wing activists

Thousands of Israeli right-wing activists and settler groups marched toward the Gaza border perimeter on Sunday, 19 July. Protesters breached several IDF checkpoints calling for the re-establishment of Israeli settlements in the enclave, creating operational friction for IDF units managing security along the border buffer zone.timesofisrael

Implication [Intelligence · Combat Engineering · Civil-Military]
  • Hitting Hamas commanders in Rafah takes two very different skill sets working the same target: real-time intelligence to locate the commander, and engineers to clear the tunnel or destroy the workshop underneath. Rehearse it together before deployment — an intel team without engineers cannot destroy a bunker, and engineers without intel are digging blind.
  • The 19 July settler march broke through IDF checkpoints because the troops had no clear rules for handling their own civilians. Any force holding a security perimeter needs written rules — well before the crisis — for what to do when protesters from the home side try to breach the line: non-lethal tools, coordination with police, and clear authority to detain. Without this, front-line units get pulled into internal politics.
Theatre 04

Israel – US – Iran

Naval Blockade Returns; Oil Spikes; Darkhovin Struck
Strategic Development
Collapse of interim standoff & maritime blockade escalation

As the latest round of US–Iran fighting escalated, Washington reimposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports, while Tehran said it was targeting vessels that violated its rules in the Strait of Hormuz, contributing to a jump in Brent crude above $90 a barrel as energy shipments through the strait were curtailed. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed it had struck and disabled two supertankers in Omani waters near Hormuz, and Gulf officials reported Emirati tankers hit in the same corridor, with fires and casualties, reinforcing the sense that commercial shipping through the southern approaches to the strait had become a high-risk zone.reuters

Fires & Strikes
Escalating US strikes & infrastructure targeting in Iran

US Central Command (CENTCOM) conducted sustained waves of strikes using fighter jets and sea-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles. Operations targeted Iranian coastal surveillance, air defences, missile/drone storage facilities, and transport nodes. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization reported that US strikes hit the under-construction Darkhovin nuclear power plant site in southwest Iran on 19 July. The IAEA confirmed the site was in very early construction and contained no nuclear material.shafaq

Implication [Sustainment · Protection · Joint Operations]
  • Two supertankers were struck by IRGC in Omani waters this week. When a chokepoint goes hostile, oil hits $90/barrel within days. Any force whose sustainment depends on that route — fuel, spare parts, food — needs a stockpile that lasts weeks, not days. Peacetime "just enough" logistics fails in the first week.
  • Army–navy coordination in a strait is the same problem Ukraine is solving at Kerch. The navy holds the water; the army holds the coast. If they do not share sensors and do not rehearse together, gaps open and ships get hit. Joint drills should include the awkward parts — who gives the fire order when a target is inside the other service's zone.
  • US Tomahawks and F-35s went after Iranian coastal radars, drone storage, and even the Darkhovin construction site. The message: fixed radars and static air-defence sites die in the first hours of a war. Ground-based radars need to move regularly, emit only when needed, and be hardened underground where possible. If it is fixed and radiating, assume it dies first.
Theatre 05

Thailand – Cambodia

Chinese Tank Deliveries Stir Nationalist Sentiment
Strategic Development
Thai alarm over Chinese tank deliveries to Cambodia

On 20 July, Foreign Minister Sihasak warned publicly that Cambodian media coverage of the tank delivery risked stirring up nationalist sentiment and destabilising a still-fragile ceasefire along the border, and said Bangkok had formally asked Beijing to consider the impact of further arms transfers on de-escalation. Chinese officials told Thai counterparts they understood these concerns, emphasised that the tank sale was a long-standing contract agreed before the clashes, and noted that delivery had already been delayed during the fighting because of the sensitive situation, while assuring Thailand that the equipment would not be used to harm it under the agreed conditions.straitstimes

Implication [Defence Diplomacy · Intelligence]
  • China delivered tanks to Cambodia under a contract signed before the border clashes. Thailand cannot stop the delivery, but media coverage on both sides can inflame publics and make the next incident bigger. Monitor the media (both sides) and the equipment together — they amplify each other.
  • ASEAN defence ministers (ADMM) should raise foreign arms transfers to border-tense states as a standing agenda item, not as a reaction to individual shipments. Waiting until the tanks arrive means arguing about facts on the ground, not policy.
  • Intelligence should track exactly what Cambodia now has: unit types, quantities, where they are deployed, what their supporting logistics look like. If the armour is upgraded, own-force combined-arms drills should be tested against those specific platforms — not against yesterday's threat picture.

Watch Areas — Next 7 Days

  • Russia – Ukraine
    21–24 July — Ukraine's parliament (Verkhovna Rada) will hold confirmation hearings to formalise the new War Cabinet and streamline defence industrial production following President Zelenskyy's executive overhaul.
  • Israel – Lebanon
    23 July — UN Security Council scheduled to hold closed consultations to evaluate UNIFIL's implementation report on Resolution 1701 and establish operational guidelines for the initial Lebanese Armed Forces deployment into the southern Zawtar pilot zones.
  • Israel – Gaza
    22 July — indirect Phase 2 negotiations mediated by Egypt and Qatar set to resume in Cairo, focusing on international border control mechanisms along the "Yellow Line" corridor and the initial insertion of the International Stabilisation Force (ISF).
  • Israel – US – Iran
    20–24 July — US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will lead diplomatic briefs at the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting to address security requirements for commercial shipping amidst the active US naval blockade and IRGC tanker disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Thailand – Cambodia
    20–24 July — 59th ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting & ARF: watch whether informal sideline talks between Thailand and Cambodia can break the diplomatic gridlock over land border demarcation.
Feedback & Reflections

Share your feedback and reflections on this week's brief.

Share Your Thoughts →